Older news items (pre-2010) brought over from the old website
Older adults more likely to "remember" misinformation
In a study involving older adults (average age 75) and younger adults (average age 19), participants studied lists of paired related words, then viewed new lists of paired words, some the same as before, some different, and some with only one of the two words the same. In those cases, the "prime" word, which was presented immediately prior to the test, was plausible but incorrect. The older adults were 10 times more likely than young adults to accept the wrong word and falsely "remember" earlier studying that word. This was true even though older adults had more time to study the list of word pairs and attained a performance level equal to that of the young adults. Additionally, when told they had the option to "pass" when unsure of an answer, older adults rarely used the option. Younger adults did, greatly reducing their false recall. The findings reflect real-world reports of a rising incidence of scams perpetrated on the elderly, which rely on the victim’s poor memory and vulnerability to the power of suggestion.
Jacoby, L. L., Bishara, A. J., Hessels, S., & Toth, J. P. (2005). Aging, subjective experience, and cognitive control: dramatic false remembering by older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134(2), 131-148. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15869342
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-05/apa-gmc051005.php
Repeated product warnings are remembered as product recommendations
Warnings about particular products may have quite the opposite effect than intended. Because we retain a familiarity with encountered items far longer than details, the more often we are told a claim about a consumer item is false, the more likely we are to accept it as true a little further down the track. Research also reveals that older adults are more susceptible to this error. It is relevant to note that in the U.S. at least, some 80% of consumer fraud victims are over 65.
Skurnik, I., Yoon, C., Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (2005). How Warnings about False Claims Become Recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 713-724. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/article/ucpjconrs/v_3a31_3ay_3a2005_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a713-724.htm
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-03/uocp-nrr032905.php
Source-memory problems not an inevitable consequence of aging, but a function of frontal-lobe efficiency
Source memory is memory for the broad contextual aspects surrounding an event, such as who was speaking, or whether you learned something from a book or TV. Previous research has found that it is in this aspect of memory that older people tend to be particularly poor. In a study that compared older individuals with undergraduates, it was found that those who performed above average on frontal-lobe tests, showed no significant impairment of source memory, regardless of age. Those with below-average performance, tended to have impaired source memory (as a group). In other words, source-memory problems are not an inevitable consequence of aging, as has been widely thought, but rather are a function of frontal-lobe efficiency. The proportion of older adults who experience frontal-lobe decline, at what ages, and to what degree, is unknown at this time.
What’s more, when researchers required people to consider the relation between an item and its context (source), age differences in memory performance completely disappeared, suggesting older adults can learn strategies to remember the context better.
Glisky, E. L., Rubin, S. R., & Davidson, P. S. R. (2001). Source Memory in Older Adults: An Encoding or Retrieval Problem? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(5), 1131-1146. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6X09-46DSYM3-1/2/6ff9dc0f5b6c822c5dd24cbdcb9fd5d4
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2001-09/apa-ada083101.php