Skip to main content

individual differences

Brain benefits from single workouts predict long-term benefits from exercise

A small pilot study, in which participants had brain scans and working memory tests before and after single sessions of light and moderate intensity exercise and after a 12-week long training program, has shown that immediate cognitive effects from exercise mirror long-term ones. Participants who saw the biggest improvements in cognition and functional brain connectivity after single sessions of moderate-intensity physical activity also showed the biggest long-term gains in cognition and connectivity.

Education & IQ linked to later cognitive decline & dementia

Americans with a college education live longer without dementia and Alzheimer's

Data from the large, long-running U.S. Health and Retirement Study found that healthy cognition characterized most of the people with at least a college education into their late 80s, while those who didn’t complete high school had good cognition up until their 70s.

Physical activity linked to better memory for names and faces among older adults

A small study that fitted 29 young adults (18-31) and 31 older adults (55-82) with a device that recorded steps taken and the vigor and speed with which they were made, has found that those older adults with a higher step rate performed better on memory tasks than those who were more sedentary. There was no such effect seen among the younger adults.

Individuals vary in how they remember events

A study involving 66 healthy young adults (average age 24) has revealed that different individuals have distinct brain connectivity patterns that are associated with different ways of experiencing and remembering the past.

Short online ‘pep talks’ can boost students

There's been a lot of talk in recent years about the importance of mindset in learning, with those who have a “growth mindset” (ie believe that intelligence can be developed) being more academically successful than those who believe that intelligence is a fixed attribute. A new study shows that a 45-minute online intervention can help struggling high school students.

Birth order has no meaningful effect on personality or IQ

Because this is such a persistent myth, I thought I should briefly report on this massive study that should hopefully put an end to this myth once and for all (I wish! Myths are not so easily squashed.)

This study used data from 377,000 U.S. high school students, and, agreeing with a previous large study, found that first-borns have a one IQ point advantage over later-born siblings, but while statistically significant, this is a difference of no practical significance.

Specific brain region distinguishes super-agers from others

Submitted by Fiona McPherson on

In 2013 I reported briefly on a pilot study showing that “super-agers” — those over 80 years old who have the brains and cognitive powers more typical of people decades younger — had an unusually large anterior cingulate cortex, with four times as many von Economo neurons.

Individual differences

Older news items (pre-2010) brought over from the old website

Learning styles challenged

A review of the research on learning styles finds that although numerous studies have claimed to show the existence of different kinds of learners, nearly all of the studies fail to satisfy key criteria for scientific validity — in particular, by randomly assigning learners classified by their “style” to one of several different learning methods (implicit in the idea of learning styles is the concept that individuals differ in regard to what mode of instruction or study is most effective for them). Of the few that did, some provided evidence flatly contradictory to the meshing hypothesis (the most common hypothesis, postulating that instruction is best provided in a format that matches the preferences of the learner) and the few findings in line with the idea did not assess popular learning-style schemes (71 different models of learning styles have been proposed over the years). The reviewers do no contest that people have preferences in how information is presented to them, or that people differ in the degree to which they use different processing modes, or that there might be untested learning styles that have significant effects. However, they argue that the lack of evidence for the postulated interaction effect is good reason not to spend limited education resources on this area that would better be devoted to adopting other educational practices that have a strong evidence base.

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-12/afps-lsd121609.php

Insight into the processes of 'positive' and 'negative' learners

An intriguing study of the electrical signals emanating from the brain has revealed two types of learners. A brainwave event called an "event-related potential" (ERP) is important in learning; a particular type of ERP called "error-related negativity" (ERN), is associated with activity in the anterior cingulate cortex. This region is activated during demanding cognitive tasks, and ERNs are typically more negative after participants make incorrect responses compared to correct choices. Unexpectedly, studies of this ERN found a difference between "positive" learners, who perform better at choosing the correct response than avoiding the wrong one, and "negative" learners, who learn better to avoid incorrect responses. The negative learners showed larger ERNs, suggesting that "these individuals are more affected by, and therefore learn more from, their errors.” Positive learners had larger ERNs when faced with high-conflict win/win decisions among two good options than during lose/lose decisions among two bad options, whereas negative learners showed the opposite pattern.

Frank, M.J., Woroch, B.S. & Curran, T. 2005. Error-Related Negativity Predicts Reinforcement Learning and Conflict Biases. Neuron, 47, 495-501.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-08/cp-iit081205.php

Attention Differences

Attention differences between individuals and ages

Older news items (pre-2010) brought over from the old website

When less attention improves behavior

An intriguing finding from a new study with confabulating patients has found that, unlike with normal individuals, or indeed other patients with damaged prefrontal lobes who don’t confabulate, memory accuracy improves when attention is reduced. It appears that lack of attention during memory retrieval is not the reason for confabulation; instead the problem might lie in over-processing irrelevant information. Training such patients to double-check the accuracy of their memories may not therefore be useful; instead they should be trained not to give too much attention to events.

Ciaramelli, E., Ghetti, S., & Borsotti, M. (2009). Divided attention during retrieval suppresses false recognition in confabulation. Cortex, 45(2), 141-153. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B8JH1-4RS9SWP-1/2/9ee1c848cc3012dc9267330429e0c0d0

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-01/e-wla012109.php

Children's under-achievement could be down to poor working memory

A survey of over three thousand children has found that 10% of school children across all age ranges suffer from poor working memory seriously affecting their learning. However, poor working memory is rarely identified by teachers, who often describe children with this problem as inattentive or as having lower levels of intelligence. The researchers have developed a new tool, a combination of a checklist and computer programme called the Working Memory Rating Scale, that enables teachers to identify and assess children's memory capacity in the classroom from as early as four years old. The tool has already been piloted successfully in 35 schools across the UK, and is now widely available. It has been translated into ten foreign languages.
http://www.physorg.com/news123404466.html 
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-02/du-cuc022608.php

Changes in brain, not age, determine one's ability to focus on task

It’s been established that one of the reasons why older adults may do less well on cognitive tasks is because they have greater difficulty in ignoring distractions, which impairs their concentration. But not all older people are afflicted by this. Some are as focused as young adults. An imaging study has now revealed a difference between the brains of those people who are good at focusing, and those who are poor. Those who have difficulty screening out distractions have less white matter in the frontal lobes. They activated neurons in the left frontal lobe as well as the right. Young people and high-functioning older adults tended to use only the right frontal lobe.

Colcombe, S. J., Kramer, A. F., Erickson, K. I., & Scalf, P. (2005). The implications of cortical recruitment and brain morphology for individual differences in inhibitory function in aging humans. Psychology and Aging, 20(3), 363-375. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16248697

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-10/uoia-cib102605.php

Memory loss in older adults due to distractions, not inability to focus

We know that older adults often have short-term memory problems, and this has been linked to problems with attention. An imaging study now provides evidence that these short-term memory problems are associated with an inability to filter out surrounding distractions, rather than problems with focusing attention. It’s been suggested that an inability to ignore distracting information may indeed be at the heart of many of the cognitive problems that accompany aging. It should be noted that this is not an inevitable effect of age — in the study, 6 of the 16 older adults involved had no problems with short-term memory or attention.

Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., & D’Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nat Neurosci, 8(10), 1298-1300. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1543

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-09/uoc--mli090805.php

Insight into the processes of 'positive' and 'negative' learners

An intriguing study of the electrical signals emanating from the brain has revealed two types of learners. A brainwave event called an "event-related potential" (ERP) is important in learning; a particular type of ERP called "error-related negativity" (ERN), is associated with activity in the anterior cingulate cortex. This region is activated during demanding cognitive tasks, and ERNs are typically more negative after participants make incorrect responses compared to correct choices. Unexpectedly, studies of this ERN found a difference between "positive" learners, who perform better at choosing the correct response than avoiding the wrong one, and "negative" learners, who learn better to avoid incorrect responses. The negative learners showed larger ERNs, suggesting that "these individuals are more affected by, and therefore learn more from, their errors.” Positive learners had larger ERNs when faced with high-conflict win/win decisions among two good options than during lose/lose decisions among two bad options, whereas negative learners showed the opposite pattern.

Frank, M. J., Woroch, B. S., & Curran, T. (2005). Error-Related Negativity Predicts Reinforcement Learning and Conflict Biases. Neuron, 47(4), 495-501. Retrieved from http://www.cell.com/neuron/abstract/S0896-6273(05)00526-X

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-08/cp-iit081205.php

Teen's ability to multi-task develops late in adolescence

A study involving adolescents between 9 and 20 years old has found that the ability to multi-task continues to develop through adolescence. The ability to use recall-guided action to remember single pieces of spatial information (such as looking at the location of a dot on a computer screen, then, after a delay, indicating where the dot had been) developed until ages 11 to 12, while the ability to remember multiple units of information in the correct sequence developed until ages 13 to 15. Tasks in which participants had to search for hidden items in a manner requiring a high level of multi-tasking and strategic thinking continued to develop until ages 16 to 17. "These findings have important implications for parents and teachers who might expect too much in the way of strategic or self-organized thinking, especially from older teenagers."

Luciana, M., Conklin, H. M., Hooper, C. J., & Yarger, R. S. (2005). The Development of Nonverbal Working Memory and Executive Control Processes in Adolescents. Child Development, 76(3), 697-712.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-05/sfri-tat051205.php

Development of working memory with age

An imaging study of 20 healthy 8- to 30-year-olds has shed new light on the development of working memory. The study found that pre-adolescent children relied most heavily on the prefrontal and parietal regions of the brain during the working memory task; adolescents used those regions plus the anterior cingulate; and in adults, a third area of the brain, the medial temporal lobe, was brought in to support the functions of the other areas. Adults performed best. The results support the view that a person's ability to have voluntary control over behavior improves with age because with development, additional brain processes are used.

The findings were presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2004-10/uopm-dow102104.php

Individual differences in Alzheimer's molecular structure

Submitted by Fiona McPherson on

The first detailed characterization of the molecular structures of amyloid-beta fibrils that develop in the brains of those with Alzheimer's disease suggests that different molecular structures of amyloid-beta fibrils may distinguish the brains of Alzheimer's patients with different clinical histories and degrees of brain damage.